Fresno State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
54  Annemarie Schwanz SR 19:49
1,628  Brittany Laygo SR 22:10
2,325  Annelis Walker FR 22:55
2,482  Kyra Johnson SR 23:08
2,930  Raven Nunez SR 24:02
3,061  Jennifer Viramontes SR 24:25
3,292  Taylor Samson SR 25:23
3,325  Alexis Miguel FR 25:32
National Rank #130 of 344
West Region Rank #21 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Annemarie Schwanz Brittany Laygo Annelis Walker Kyra Johnson Raven Nunez Jennifer Viramontes Taylor Samson Alexis Miguel
Sundodger Invitational 09/17 1140 19:44 22:05 23:02 23:26 23:58 24:52 25:33
Stanford Invitational 10/01 1165 19:50 21:46 22:38 23:43 24:44 25:08
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 19:49
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/15 1425 22:12 22:55 22:52 24:18 25:21 25:29
Mountain West Championship 10/28 1219 19:54 22:44 23:07 24:46 24:15 25:15 26:22
West Region Championships 11/11 19:52





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.4 899 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.3 5.9 14.0 28.7



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Annemarie Schwanz 50.3% 49.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Annemarie Schwanz 17.0 0.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.8 3.7 3.5 3.9 3.4 4.5 4.1 4.8 4.3 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.0 3.5 2.7 3.1
Brittany Laygo 178.2
Annelis Walker 220.0
Kyra Johnson 229.4
Raven Nunez 254.5
Jennifer Viramontes 260.0
Taylor Samson 264.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.5% 0.5 27
28 1.3% 1.3 28
29 5.9% 5.9 29
30 14.0% 14.0 30
31 28.7% 28.7 31
32 30.9% 30.9 32
33 16.7% 16.7 33
34 1.9% 1.9 34
35 0.1% 0.1 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0